Monthly Archive for October, 2007

Yo Mama 2.0

Your Mum Owes Me

Being a Web 2.0™ internet genius is hard work. You need to constantly think all sorts of important things about stuff. You have to blog daily even if you don’t really have anything to say. And, of course, you need to put pictures of your babies on Flickr so the world can sleep at night, secure in the knowledge that you have safely passed your superior genes onto the next generation.

Hard workers like this need to have a laugh now and then. It’s the best medicine, aside from Jack Daniels. One of my favourite humour genres has always been Yo Mama jokes, ever since March 1982, when one of my schoolmates told me a joke about how fat my mama was. I laughed really hard, too, because man, bitch was fat! Sadly, most Yo Mama jokes were invented in the 1970s and times have changed. Those losers didn’t even have the internet! So it is in the interest of Laughter 2.0 that I bring you this update to the venerable classic: Yo Mama 2.0.

  • Yo mama so fat, she heard “RSS Feeds” and thought it was a new all-you-can-eat buffet.
  • Yo mama so fat, she’s Yo Mama 2.0: all rounded corners, baby!
  • Yo mama is so stupid, she asked me something in person instead of checking the wiki first.
  • Yo mama so fat, she thought del.icio.us was a way to download food.
  • Yo mama so fat, she need two Facebook profiles.
  • Yo mama so fat, she went to Moo.com to download cheeseburgers.
  • Yo mama so dumb, when I said “tag cloud”, bitch bought an umbrella.

My friend and esteemed colleague Rory deserves credit for that last one. That’s all we have for now because the internet really isn’t that funny at all: the internet is serious business.

Pan Sonic at Conway Hall, 11 October 2007

Whenever I walk up New Oxford Street and branch off onto Bloomsbury Way, my mind wanders more than it usually does during walks about town. Because this particularly dismal stretch of central London is so bland, I invent games to play in my head in order to avoid the dementia that can be induced by an endless stream of Caffe Neros and tourist tchotchke shops. Maybe if I were a French student in 1968 I’d embrace the ennui, but on Thursday night I was content to busy myself with a combination of thoughts that centred around estimating how much of the Haswell/Hecker set I was missing and whether or not the gig would be selling beer (and, if not, where I could buy beer - I like beer).

Arriving at Conway Hall, Haswell/Hecker was already in progress. The auditorium doors were closed as if to prevent a vicious pathogen from escaping and infecting whomever may have been lingering around after work in the mostly empty streets of Holborn. I sorted out my ticket and received a hand stamp marking my paid entry: a magic marker scrawl of the letters “HP” on my right hand. I was happy to publicly express my support of brown sauce.

With no caution whatsoever, I swung open the performance room doors only to be assaulted with a harshly high-end blast of sine wave treble. I was pleased to discover that after all these years listening to noise, I could not only still hear sounds in that range but also feel pain from them. It was pretty horrible, so I knew I was in for a good night.

The room was also filled with green laser beams shooting in every direction. Although not nearly as energy-efficient, I think some Throbbing Gristlesque halogen lamps would have worked better with this sound. My ears were bleeding but my eyes were watching a Pink Floyd night in a 1970s American planetarium.

Haswell/Hecker did scale back from that high octave onslaught to show us some low-end mercy. The more than capable sound system that they packed into Conway Hall vibrated the bones, but I still needed beer to warm the spirit. Now, I know, this makes me a bad music fan, and perhaps an alcoholic as well, but I left after about 15 minutes of their set to find some lager.

On returning from Sainsbury’s with a 4 pack of Kronenberg (which I think I chose subconsciously because of the differently-spelled film director of the same name), it was intermission and most conversations I overheard seemed really impressed with Haswell/Hecker. I felt a bit bad that I had skipped out on so much of it, but I was really impressed with my ability to find beer in Holborn on a weeknight.

Time for Pan Sonic at last came around, providing me with a bit of déjà vu, as their accompanying visuals hadn’t changed as far as I could tell in the few odd years since I’d last seen them. Why bother changing anything that works so well? The black vibrating wave on a grey screen, as minimal as the sound it represented.

Static fought against the beats, reminiscent of a mix between Autechre’s LP5 and Merzbow’s Merzbeat. Despite the many layers of sound, everything felt like the work of a duo. You could clearly hear the pure elements of synthesizer and rhythm jockey for position. In the end I think it was a draw. If there was a winner it was definitely the machine in the back on the right side of the table: a synthesizer controlled by what appeared to me to be a lever. That thing was badass! If it were a guitar, it would have been V-shaped with 10 necks (and a lever).

From people I talked to after the gig to other reviews that I’ve read in the past week, the consensus appears to be that Haswell/Hecker blew everyone away, whilst Pan Sonic was mildly disappointing. I couldn’t agree less, however, as my favourite part of the night was the Pan Sonic set. Yes, admittedly, I was on a beer run for most of Haswell/Hecker, but from what I saw of their set, it was more extreme and maximal. I quite like extremity, and I love what I heard, but Pan Sonic’s more restrained approach may have been an anti-climax after a display of such sheer sonic force.

Regardless of how the two sets measured up against each other, overall it was an ace night. £12, two artists, one simple room: no nonsense, nice and simple. I can only hope to lose more of my hearing to them in the near future.

Join In The Chant

Yesterday was Blog Action Day. For those who missed it, which I assume is everyone who doesn’t live in a bloggerati bubble, Blog Action Day was designed to be a day of activism for bloggers. One issue would be chosen for all bloggers to write about and somehow if every blogger in the world wrote about that one issue on the chosen day, everything would sprout a piece of awesome out its head (or its arse).

This year’s chosen cause was The Environment, which is good because global warming troubles me. I feel bad that I failed to write about it, but it looks like everyone else did a good job because it’s a mild 15 degrees outside today. Well done!

The best part about Blog Action Day was that bloggers didn’t have to do anything difficult or even different to what they do every day: they just had to sit on their fat arses and write. There was no imperative for bloggers to lead by example and do even a small thing to help the environment, they just had to sit back and tell everyone else to do it. Wait, why did I miss this again?

The tagline on the Blog Action Day site asks,

What would happen if every blog published posts discussing the same issue, on the same day?
One issue. One day. Thousands of voices.

I reckon that the same thing would be said in about a few thousand different ways, a bit like a bad cover version of a song that once held a deep meaning for you, but lost it after you heard it limply regurgitated once too many times.

I’m sorry to be so cynical about what could be seen as a great consciousness-raising activity, but I can’t help but think that everyone’s efforts would be better spent actually doing something to help the environment besides writing about it on blogs. Start recycling! Use your car less and walk or bike more! Turn off your computer and save some electricity?

Does it count if I Twitter about the environment, or is the extent to which I saved the environment directly proportional to my word count?

Perfect Teeth

Perfect Smile

I always new that the Do-It-Yourself punk rock spirit was alive and well in the UK. In the headlines of BBC News as well as CNN, I learned today that the dental situation is so bad in Britain that people are resorting to “DIY dentistry”: pliers and glue at home instead of a trip to a proper dentist.

Why would anyone in their right mind do something so medieval? Poverty and the lack of a reasonable state-provided alternative. Whilst the NHS offers free health care for the rest of your body, it doesn’t look after your mouth much at all. NHS dentists are hard to find and if you do, you could be waiting for quite a while to receive treatment. There are, of course, plenty of private dental practices where you can pay for any service you want and get immediate care, but that requires money.

I’ll be the first to admit that the NHS is fantastic compared to the complete lack of socialised medicine in the United States. I can see how some may think its poor dental offerings are a minor concern, given that Americans don’t have many unpaid medical options at all. The situation in the US is dire, but it doesn’t exempt the UK from working toward the improvement of its own system. It should be the goal of any nation to be able to provide free health care to all of its citizens, and once it can do that, its goal should be to perfect that system. Just because America hasn’t sorted the first part of that out yet doesn’t mean Britain can disregard the importance of the latter.

I have lived in the UK for a year now and haven’t been to a dentist at all in that time. Normally, I’d have been twice for cleanings, but that’s one luxury I no longer have. My previous job offered full medical and dental benefits, but since my current company offers no private coverage, I choose to save that money and just hope for the best.

My wife has been to the dentist once in London. She went to a private practice because everyone we know told us to not even bother trying to find an NHS dentist. She needed a cavity filled, which set her back about £75, plus another £18 for a required consultation that lasted all of five-minutes. She works full-time, luckily, and so this was at least possible, but even still that was a major chunk of her income for the week. If she needed a more advanced prodecure, would I have had to send her down to the hardware store?

Present Shock

Before I was aware of the Alvin Toffler book, I first heard the phrase “Future Shock” as the title of a song by New Zealand rockers, The Gordons. Featured on their 1980 EP of the same name, it’s a ferocious five minutes of punk repetition, with not much discernible aside from the same chords played over and over whilst the vocalist wails, “Future shock! Future shock!” It’s one of my favourite songs.

As a phrase open to interpretation, “future shock” feels incredibly relevant to modern life, however in its pure Tofflerian meaning, it shows its age. Toffler’s main argument is that the growing levels of anxiety and disconnection felt by people today are directly related to our movement from an industrial to a super-industrial, or at least post-cooperative, society. With our human interactions increasingly mediated by machines, the interactions themselves are becoming less human and more mechanical.

With over 30 years of hindsight, Toffler’s ideas are hard to explain without making them sound luddite. His predictions failed to imagine the rise of the internet and social software and the degree to which these tools could bring people closer together. On the other hand, however, one can’t completely shove it all aside as technophobic hogwash. How many Facebook friends does it take to make you happy?

Regardless of how relevant Future Shock is to me in 2007, I’m finding myself feeling something new lately that has me thinking of it again. It’s not even a new feeling exactly, rather it’s just something I’ve finally been able to put my finger on as a means of explaining the strangeness that I feel sometimes when not computing. It’s not anxiety over the future at all, it’s frustration that it hasn’t arrived completely enough yet.

The virtual environment in which I spend so many of the hours of my days places a convenience at my fingers that no longer exists when I step away from the keyboard. I put the laptop in a physical bag and walk on feet for ten minutes to a train, where I sit for sixteen minutes before arriving in my neighbourhood and walking five minutes to my flat. Ten minutes, sixteen minutes, five minutes and some more minutes spent waiting for the train, possibly the worst minutes of all because I’m not specifically doing something. I read all the advertisements in under one minute. They stay there for weeks. If they were replaced by screens and changed infinitely, perhaps I would buy more.

I’m experiencing a sort of “present shock”, a sense of disconnection resulting from being disconnected. The physical world fails to move as quickly as the virtual world to which I have adapted. Toffler didn’t really give us enough credit to adapt to the rapid changes of the modern world, nor did he place enough value on how compelling a technologically-enhanced life would eventually become.

Just like Toffler, though, I’m not giving myself, or any of us, enough credit. My present shock is fleeting and almost as soon as I realise that I am feeling it, it slips away. I like the downtime, the slowness, the lack of teleportation choices from Transport For London. Most times I just play Nintendo.

In all seriousness, however, it fades and I love it. When I go away somewhere on holiday, I’m not one of these freaks that has to bring a fucking Blackberry or an iPhone or whatever the latest connection-maintaining device is. Our adaptability defines us as much as fast evaporation defines present shock. It’s a perception of extreme slowness experienced during the in-between moments of transition from a technologically-enhanced, high speed realm down to one that is chiefly physical and acutely real-time.

Although I may live mostly in a highly excited state of overstimulation, after passing through momentary present shock I’m pleasantly back where I started. I’m not sure where that is even, but it feels real.

The Gordons - “Future Shock”